Darwin’s Dangerous Idea Episode 1 Body & Soul (BBC)

Please Subscribe To The EvolutionDocumentary YouTube Channel: www.youtube.com Broadcast (2009) In the first episode of the three-part series, Andrew Marr explores how Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection has taken on a life of its own far beyond the world of science. He argues that Darwin’s theory has transformed our understanding of what it means to be human. Over the last 150 years, Darwin’s ideas have challenged the need for a creator, undermined religious authority, and provided new ways of looking at the origins of human morality. Marr’s journey begins following Darwin’s footsteps in Tierra del Fuego at the southernmost tip of South America where Darwin first encountered an ‘uncivilised’ native tribe. This began to raise questions in his mind about the origins of the human race. The answers to these questions would emerge over the next 30 years, culminating in the publication of On The Origin of Species in 1859. Marr then traces the development of Darwin’s idea in the years since then and finds a range of influences that Darwin could never have imagined: from the existential philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche to the battlefields of the First World War; from the Freudian psychoanalyst’s couch to the Vatican; and from the genetic logic of kindness to an Islamic creationist’s claim that Darwin is to blame for modern terrorism. Darwin’s dangerous idea is as influential and challenging today as it was 150 years ago. In this three-part series Andrew Marr


Best DNA Test Related Blogs

    Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

    18 Responses to “Darwin’s Dangerous Idea Episode 1 Body & Soul (BBC)”

    1. kolearian Says:

      03:54 What is that person smoking? lol

    2. Campineiroamericano Says:

      Darwin’s ideas are not dangerous. It is what humans do by how they interprete it that can be.

    3. liberalguy513 Says:

      @kolearian Worse yet, what’s that monkey smoking?

    4. b2e1z Says:

      I learned something significant from this. Ignore anything with BBC in the title.

    5. AscendingParadigm Says:

      It’s okay to come from dirt… just not primordial soup.

    6. krapptacular Says:

      Yeah evolution and dna does not control people. And people are realy dumb enough to think that.

    7. Nixom1334 Says:

      because Genocide did not exist before Darwin, Oh wait

    8. niekvdbogert Says:

      @b2e1z pls elaborate…

    9. krapptacular Says:

      They had written on the belts, “Gods with Us” And the catholic church was involed in hitlers shit. Hitler was a creationist. And also morals comes from me, i don’t want to hurt another person, or rip my fellow man or woman off. Becuse I’m not a scumbag, I’m sorry i have morals that have nothing to do with god, and yet i am a good person. I don’t hate believers at all, i just will never live the way they want me to. Screw that shit.

    10. NewUser21111 Says:

      Dangerous only to Creationists and Televangelists. lol suckers…

    11. leffehoegaarden Says:

      @b2e1z Yeah, you’ll be better off watching Kent Hovind. Twat.

    12. ventura433 Says:

      @AscendingParadigm lol good point

    13. 01101100d Says:

      That turkish guy is a bloody idiot. How can he have no science education, yet have the ego to think he knows how to disprove something that he doesn’t understand. Just like virtually every other creationist, slow and stupid.

    14. InPursuitOfALife Says:

      I used to be a creationist, but than i took an arrow to the knee

    15. JonO387 Says:

      Charles Darwin does not have “followers”. Does Newton have followers? Does Einstein have followers? Since no one can deny gravity, is everyone on Earth a Newton follower? The terminology used in this documentary is way off in some places. Until someone can show even the smallest shred of evidence for any god, people who believe in a god, or multiple gods, are delusional.

    16. Watsonthe2nd Says:

      I suppose the terminology could apply to the main reaction of Darwin’s theory at the time-it must have seemed like a dangerous idea back in the mid-nineteenth century, somewhat challenging the idea of a creator or at least dependence on a creator. It’s not a dangerous idea today, but back then with more people trusting the Bible than things like science…well. Need I say any more?

    17. Meskiagkasher Says:

      But it’s NOT Darwin’s Dangerous Idea. It’s Nature’s Dangerous Idea. Darwin only described it. It is idiotic t think that without Darwin there would be no evolution.
      And Harun Yahya is a complete retard. He can’t even distinguish fishing flies from real flies.

    18. MrJujitsu62 Says:

      Excellent !!

    Leave a Reply

    CommentLuv Enabled

    This site uses KeywordLuv. Enter YourName@YourKeywords in the Name field to take advantage.

    Powered by Yahoo! Answers